The Department of Labor (DOL) reported that as of Jan. 30, 2025, a total of 5,829 cases were issued Final Decision for fiscal year (FY) 2025 (first half of the visa cap) with a Requested Date of Need from Oct. 1, 2024, through March 31, 2025. Certified positions for this period were allocated for 108,189 workers.

The chart below indicates the number of Final Decisions issued and Positions Certified for filing windows from July 2024 to January 2025:

Filing window Total cases issued

Final Decision

Total worker Positions Certified
July 2024 2,492 44,907
August 2024 485 7,884
September 2024 219 3,849
October 2024 359 10,414
November 2024 763 16,973
December 2024 1,498 24,072
January 2025 13 90

As of Jan. 7, 2025, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services received enough petitions to reach the additional 20,716 H-2B visas made available for returning workers for the first half of FY 2025 with start dates on or before March 31, 2025.

DOL is still processing Group A for applications received for Requested Date of Need from April 1, 2025.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice Group.

Copyright © 2025 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries, please contact copyright@bal.com.

On Jan. 17, the U.S. and Indian governments dedicated a new U.S. consulate site in Bengaluru, India.

Key Points:

  • The Bengaluru site will be the fifth U.S. consulate in India.
  • The initiative to expand the U.S. presence in Bengaluru will broaden and deepen the long-standing ties, diplomatic engagement and strategic partnership between the United States and the state of Karnataka.
  • Consular services will continue to be performed at the U.S. Consulate in Chennai and other U.S. diplomatic posts in India until site completion.

Additional Information: Bengaluru (formerly called Bangalore) has been called “the Silicon Valley of India.” The U.S. government first established an office in Bengaluru in 1993. As the capital of the southern state of Karnataka, it is home to nearly 700 U.S. companies, including aerospace ventures.

Planned launches for 2025 include the jointly developed NASA-ISRO (Indian Space Research Organization) Synthetic Aperture Radar satellite and a U.S. mission to bring NASA-trained Indian astronauts to the International Space Station.

A fact sheet detailing business investments and developments in Karnataka can be downloaded here.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice Group.

Copyright © 2025 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries, please contact copyright@bal.com.

On Jan. 29, President Trump signed the Laken Riley Act into law, mandating that the Department of Homeland Security detain certain undocumented foreign nationals who have been arrested for certain crimes and authorizing states to sue the federal government for certain alleged failures related to immigration enforcement.

Key Points:

  • The bill mandates that DHS detain individuals who (1) are unlawfully present in the United States or did not possess the necessary documents when applying for admission; and (2) have been charged with, arrested for, convicted of or admit to having committed acts that constitute the essential elements of burglary, theft, larceny or shoplifting.
  • States are authorized to sue the federal government for injunctive relief over:
    • A decision to release a non-U.S. national from custody.
    • Failure to fulfill requirements relating to inspecting individuals seeking admission into the United States, including requirements related to asylum interviews.
    • Failure to fulfill a requirement to stop issuing visas to nationals of a country that unreasonably denies or delays acceptance of nationals of that country.
    • Violation of limitations on immigration parole, such as the requirement that parole be granted only on a case-by-case basis.
    • Failure to detain an individual who has been ordered removed from the United States.
  • The full text of the bill can be read at congress.gov.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice Group.

Copyright © 2025 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries, please contact copyright@bal.com.

The Department of State announced that all visa interview and Applicant Service Center appointments in Colombia are canceled for Jan. 27-29, 2025.*

*Note that this alert has been updated to reflect the announcement that the cancelations have been extended to Jan. 29, 2025.

Key Points:

  • All scheduling and rescheduling of visa appointments have also been suspended.
  • The cancellations are due to the Colombian government’s initial refusal last week to accept repatriation flights of Colombian nationals from the U.S.

Additional Information: Following Colombian President Gustavo Petro’s refusal to accept two repatriation flights he previously authorized, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio ordered a suspension of visa issuance on Jan. 26 at the U.S. Embassy Bogota consular section. Secretary Rubio also authorized travel sanctions on individuals and their families who were responsible for the interference of U.S. repatriation flight operations.

President Petro released a statement later on Jan. 26 confirming the Colombian government would accept all deportation flights.

The White House followed with a statement that declared penalties such as visa sanctions will remain in effect until the first planeload of deportees has arrived in Colombia.

BAL will continue to monitor the situation and report on updates as more information becomes available.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice Group.

Copyright © 2025 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries, please contact copyright@bal.com.

On Jan. 23, a Washington state federal district court judge issued a nationwide temporary restraining order (TRO) against President Trump’s Executive Order (EO) limiting birthright citizenship.

Key Points:

  • Judge John C. Coughenour of the U.S. District Court Western District of Washington at Seattle issued a nationwide 14-day TRO against President Trump’s “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship” EO signed on Jan. 20, which sought to change the existing criteria for birthright citizenship established by the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
  • The plaintiff states challenging the EO in the federal district court include Washington, Arizona, Illinois and Oregon.
  • The judge found that “there is a strong likelihood that Plaintiffs will succeed on the merits of their claims that the Executive Order violates the Fourteenth Amendment and Immigration and Nationality Act,” and that “the balance of equities tips toward the Plaintiff States and the public interest strongly weighs in favor of entering temporary relief.”
  • The TRO does not stop the EO from going into effect as scheduled, but the judge will now consider arguments for a preliminary injunction.

Additional Information: The case is one of multiple lawsuits filed by Democratic attorneys general and immigrant rights organizations challenging the order.

The “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship” EO directs agencies not to recognize birthright citizenship for a child born in the U.S. if the father is not a citizen or green card holder and the mother is either in the U.S. unlawfully or in the U.S. lawfully but temporarily. The EO applies to births 30 days after publication.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice Group.

Copyright © 2025 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries, please contact copyright@bal.com.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced that effective Jan. 22, it will waive the requirement to present documentation of COVID-19 vaccination(s) for certain adjustment of status (AOS) applicants.

Key Points:

  • USCIS is waiving any and all requirements that applicants for AOS to that of a lawful permanent resident present documentation that they received the COVID-19 vaccination on their Form I-693, Report of Immigration Medical Examination and Vaccination Record.
  • USCIS will not issue any Request for Evidence or Notice of Intent to Deny related to proving a COVID-19 vaccination.
  • USCIS will not deny any AOS application based on the applicant’s failure to present documentation that they received the COVID-19 vaccination.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice Group.

Copyright © 2025 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries, please contact copyright@bal.com.

On Jan. 20, the president issued the “Protecting the United States from Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats” Executive Order (EO) that gives federal agencies a 60-day period to identify countries that may warrant restrictions affecting the ability of foreign nationals to travel to the United States. It did not announce specific travel restrictions.

Key Points:

  • The EO requires that the agencies “re-establish a uniform baseline for screening and vetting standards and procedures, consistent with the uniform baseline that existed on January 19, 2021, that will be used for any alien seeking a visa or immigration benefit of any kind” and vet and screen individuals “to the maximum degree possible.”
  • Over the next 60 days, the agencies must “determine the information needed from any country to adjudicate any visa, admission, or other benefit under the INA [Immigration and Nationality Act] for one of its nationals, and to ascertain whether the individual seeking the benefit is who the individual claims to be and that the individual is not a security or public-safety threat.”
  • The EO also requires a report to be submitted to the president “identifying countries throughout the world for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)).”
  • As of Jan. 21, the government has not announced specific planned changes or travel restrictions, so there are no public details regarding the possible timing or scope of potential future bans, nor whether any exemptions or waivers will be available.

Additional Information: The president has the authority to restrict the entry of foreign nationals or classes of foreign nationals into the United States and may impose additional restrictions deemed appropriate. Previous travel restrictions have been announced without prior warning and affected foreign nationals from specific countries, in certain nonimmigrant visa categories and those with connections to certain foreign institutions or organizations. Restrictions have also included heightened scrutiny and enhanced vetting of visa applicants.

U.S. immigration policies may change quickly and without prior notice. Foreign nationals are reminded to speak with their BAL team prior to international travel and to be aware of general travel requirements, including maintaining a valid visa in their passport. Foreign nationals may face delays in obtaining a visa appointment at a U.S. consulate or embassy or receiving their visa and should plan accordingly. They may also face further delays with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) during re-entry into the U.S. after travel.

BAL will continue to provide updates as additional information becomes available.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice Group.

Copyright © 2025 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries, please contact copyright@bal.com.

On Jan. 20, President Trump signed multiple Executive Orders (EOs) that are focused on immigration. Within those EOs are over 50 directives to government agencies.

Key Points:

  • Following are takeaways from President Trump’s EOs:
    • Travel Bans: Trump did not impose any immediate travel bans but did set up a 60-day review process to identify countries that may warrant a later travel ban. Government agencies were directed to implement enhanced vetting and screening, which will likely lead to delays at consular posts and with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services applications.
    • Birthright Citizenship: The “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship” EO directs agencies not to recognize birthright citizenship for a child born in the U.S. if the father is not a citizen or green card holder and the mother is either in the U.S. unlawfully or in the U.S. lawfully but temporarily. The EO applies to births 30 days after publication. Litigation challenging this policy has already been filed in court.
    • Nationality-Based Parole Programs: The “Securing Our Borders” EO directs agencies to terminate categorical parole programs. The EO only explicitly referenced the programs granting parole to qualifying nationals of Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela, but other similar programs for nationals of Ukraine and Afghanistan will also be terminated. At this time, the language does not specify any effect to current parole or work authorization for individuals already in the U.S.
    • Border and Interior Enforcement: The “Securing Our Borders” EO also declared a national emergency, which allows the Department of Defense to support border construction and deploy personnel and funds in support of the Department of Homeland Security. The EO also required DHS to cease use of the CBP One app and terminate all categorical parole programs. Shortly after President Trump was sworn in, and before the EO was published, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) removed the scheduling function from its CBP One app.
    • Temporary Protected Status: The “Protecting American People Against Invasion” EO directs the agencies to review the country determinations.
    • Refugee Program: The “Realigning the United States Refugee Admissions Program” (USRAP) EO immediately suspended USRAP and subjects the program to a 90-day review. If it resumes, states and localities may have a say in whether refugees are resettled in their geographies.
  • Other EOs and memorandum impact other aspects of U.S. immigration, with a focus on border security and enforcement. The president also targeted federal government hiring practices and workforce, which could impact U.S. immigration processing in the months and years to come.
  • President Trump also rescinded a number of prior EOs, including President Biden’s EOs on the “Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence” and “Restoring Faith in Our Legal Immigration Systems and Strengthening Integration and Inclusion Efforts for New Americans.”

Additional Information: There was no direct reference to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Immigration policies and practices are subject to change, especially at the start of a new presidential administration. Employers are encouraged to work with their BAL team to determine the impact of policy changes on their program. BAL is monitoring policy developments and will continue to provide updates as more information is released.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice Group.

Copyright © 2025 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries, please contact copyright@bal.com.

The Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Texas vs. USA on Jan. 17 that the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Final Rule is “substantively unlawful,” but will maintain status quo with DACA’s policy of forbearance and limit its injunction to Texas only.

Key Points:

  • This is the latest chapter in the long-running litigation challenging the Final Rule by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on DACA published Aug. 30, 2022.
  • The Fifth Circuit largely agreed with the concluding Final Rule, like the DACA Memorandum it replaced, was both “substantively unlawful” (see also “Additional Information” below) and in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
  • The Fifth Circuit affirmed its judgement with the following significant changes to the district court’s remedial order:
    • The Final Rule includes a severability clause stating that if any provision of the Rule is held “invalid and unenforceable in all circumstances,” then that “provision shall be severable from the remainder of this subpart and shall not affect the remainder thereof.” The Fifth Circuit found that because DHS intended the dual aspects of DACA to be severable and to function independently from one another, the district court erred by not severing the forbearance from removal provisions from the work-authorization provisions. The Fifth Circuit’s ruling therefore limited the District Court’s vacatur order to the work authorization provision, leaving the protection from removal provision intact.
    • The Fifth Circuit also limited the scope of the injunction to Texas because Texas was the only plaintiff that demonstrated an actual injury and that injury — costs related to providing health, education and social services to DACA recipients — was fully redressable by a geographically limited injunction.
  • The Fifth Circuit preserved the stay regarding DACA’s policy of forbearance (which protects DACA recipients enrolled prior to the district court’s July 2021 order) because “DACA has had profound significance to recipients and many others in the [now-twelve] years since its adoption … Given the uncertainty of final disposition and the inevitable disruption that would arise from a lack of continuity and stability.”

Additional Information: DACA specifically offers removal protections and work permit eligibility to immigrants who arrived in the country without authorization as children and were 30 or younger when it was launched in 2012. In 2021, a district court held that Texas has standing to challenge DACA and that DACA is procedurally and substantively unlawful. The court halted the program and enjoined the government from approving any new DACA applications but stayed the effective date of its vacatur to all DACA recipients who had received their initial DACA status before the date of the order. In 2022, the Fifth Circuit appellate court affirmed in part and remanded because DHS had cured DACA’s procedural defect by promulgating a Final Rule.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice Group.

Copyright © 2025 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries, please contact copyright@bal.com.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) announced today that Australia is now an official Global Entry partner country, making Australia one of 19 partner countries whose citizens can apply for Global Entry membership.

Key Points:

  • Australian Global Entry applicants undergo rigorous and recurring vetting by both the U.S. and Australian authorities, including an in-person interview before initial enrollment.
  • Australia is processing Global Entry applications in a two-phased approach, with a limited number of applications for phase one. Applications for phase one are now open. Phase two will allow all Australian citizens to apply for Global Entry. An Australian Department of Home Affairs Global Entry program webpage has more information on the program.
  • To maintain low-risk traveler status, Global Entry members must not violate any of the program’s terms and conditions. Violations will result in enforcement action and termination of the traveler’s membership privileges.

Additional Information: Global Entry is one of CBP’s four Trusted Traveler Programs. The program also provides access to TSA PreCheck for eligible members, offering quicker security screening for domestic travelers at participating U.S. airports.

Additional Global Entry partner countries include Argentina, Bahrain, Brazil, Colombia, Croatia, the Dominican Republic, Germany, India, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Panama, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, Switzerland, Taiwan, the United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom.

Global Entry partnerships enhance security and promote bilateral trade, tourism and cultural exchange by allowing pre-vetted, low-risk Australian citizens expedited customs and immigration processing upon arrival to the U.S.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice Group.

Copyright © 2025 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries, please contact copyright@bal.com.